Private company
Who owns Brewers Retail Inc. (The Beer Store, Ontario)
One company in the researched set discloses a stake in Brewers Retail Inc. (The Beer Store, Ontario), none of it sized by anyone who discloses it. Brewers Retail Inc. (The Beer Store, Ontario) is private, so no 13F reports it: a 13F covers exchange listed positions only. These figures exist because each holder disclosed the stake in its own filings.
Brewers Retail Inc. (The Beer Store, Ontario) - Profile
- Type
- joint venture
- Based in
- Canada
- Founded
- 1927
Brewers Retail Inc. trades as The Beer Store, the brewer owned retail and wholesale chain that has sold beer in Ontario since 1927. It lists products from Ontario, Canadian and international brewers on non discriminatory terms at prices approved by the provincial regulator, supplies bars, restaurants and other licensees, operates LCBO Convenience Outlets in smaller communities and provides draught and logistics services to other retailers. It also runs the province's beer container recovery system and participates in Ontario's Deposit Return Program, taking back and reusing or recycling roughly 1.6 billion containers a year and more than 170 billion since it began. Its role changed in May 2024 when the Ontario government opened beer and wine sales to convenience stores, grocers and big box retailers ahead of schedule, and the chain has closed dozens of outlets since, operating under an agreement to maintain at least 300 stores to the end of 2025. It is owned by the brewers whose beer it sells, principally Molson Coors, Labatt Breweries of Canada and Sleeman.
Source
Brewers Retail Inc. (The Beer Store, Ontario) files nothing with the SEC, so none of this comes from a filer record. The description was written for this site in August 2026 from About us (The Beer Store), The Beer Store (Wikipedia) and 10 more Ontario Beer Stores set to close amid changing alcohol landscape (Global News). The ownership figures below come from the holders' filings instead, and are sourced row by row.
The disclosed stakes
One row per position. Where a holder reports the same company in two share classes, both rows are shown rather than summed, because the class is part of a position's identity.
Where each figure comes from
A private stake has no ownership form behind it, so the source is always the holder's own filing or disclosure. Anything modelled says so, with the arithmetic.
- Molson Coors Beverage Company, as of 30 Jun 2026. Q2 2026 10-Q, Note 3 'Investments', Equity Method Investments: 'Our equity method investments include our ownership interests in Brewers Retail Inc. ("BRI") and Brewers Distributor Ltd. ("BDL"), as well as other immaterial investments. The total balance of our equity method investments was $145.3 million and $135.7 million as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.' This is a COMBINED balance covering BRI, BDL and unnamed other immaterial investments; the filing does not split it by investee, so per the rule on combined equity-method balances, value_usd is null here rather than assigned to BRI alone (the combined $145.3m figure is in notes/unknowns, not attributed to any one line). Ownership percentage: not disclosed in any Molson Coors SEC filing found. A web search found secondary/press sources (Wikipedia-sourced, undated as of this research) reporting BRI ("The Beer Store") ownership as approximately Molson Coors 50.9%, Labatt/AB InBev 44.9%, Sleeman/Sapporo 4.2%, plus a small pool of Ontario craft brewers; this was NOT confirmed against a primary filing or a dated source and is deliberately left out of pct_of_target to avoid reporting an unverified, possibly-stale figure as sourced. source
What this page is not
It is not a complete register. It lists the holders who happen to be inside the researched set and disclosed the stake themselves. A private company can have many other shareholders, and nothing here rules them out: venture investors, founders and employees usually appear in no public filing at all. Percentages are of Brewers Retail Inc. (The Beer Store, Ontario) where a holder stated one, and are missing where no holder did.
